Hemlo vs Polymarket

Brazil Presidential Election

Hemlo leader
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva44% Hemlo
Outcome
Polymarket
Hemlo
Romeu Zema
4%
4%
Renan Santos
6%
16%
Camilo Santana
3%
0%
Jair Bolsonaro
100%
0%
Fernando Haddad
4%
0%
Flávio Bolsonaro
45%
24%
Tarcisio de Freitas
100%
12%
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
38%
44%
Verdict

The simulation results indicate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as the leading outcome with 44% of the votes, significantly outperforming other candidates. This outcome is driven by Lula's established political base, his perceived stability in economic policies, and his ability to address social inequalities, which resonated with agents like Maria Helena Costa and Dona Lúcia Santos. In contrast, the market crowd pricing favored Flávio Bolsonaro at 45%, suggesting a discrepancy between simulated agent behavior and market expectations, possibly due to the market's focus on short-term economic deregulation and pro-business policies. The simulation highlights a stronger preference for Lula's long-term social and economic stability over Bolsonaro's deregulation approach.

Why Hemlo moved

Key Factors

1.Lula's established political base and experience
2.Perceived stability in economic policies
3.Focus on reducing social inequality
4.Distrust of the Bolsonaro family's polarizing rhetoric
5.Support from social welfare-dependent demographics
Agent signal

Notable People

MA
Maria Helena CostaRetired teacher
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
PA
Patricia SouzaLandowner in Mato Grosso
Flávio Bolsonaro
AN
Ana Beatriz FerreiraEnvironmental activist and lawyer
Romeu Zema
Simulation core

Run Signal

44%
15 agents modeled
5 simulation rounds
50 agent actions recorded