Hemlo vs Polymarket

Presidential Election Winner 2028

Hemlo leader
JD Vance26% Hemlo
Outcome
Polymarket
Hemlo
JD Vance
20%
26%
Jon Ossoff
4%
14%
Marco Rubio
14%
24%
Gavin Newsom
17%
10%
Josh Shapiro
3%
14%
Kamala Harris
5%
0%
Tucker Carlson
3%
6%
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
6%
6%
Verdict

The simulation results indicate JD Vance as the leading outcome with 26% of the votes, followed closely by Marco Rubio at 24%. JD Vance's appeal stems from his pragmatic stance on trade policies and labor protection, resonating with agents like Tommy O'Leary and Bob Halloway, who see him as a unifying figure for conservative and rural voters. Marco Rubio's strong showing is attributed to his international credibility and business-friendly legislative history, as highlighted by agents like David Chen and Lena Volkov. Interestingly, the crowd pricing undervalues Vance (20% vs. 26%) and Rubio (14% vs. 24%), suggesting the market may be underestimating their potential. Gavin Newsom, while favored by some agents for his fundraising and approval ratings, lags behind in both simulation and crowd pricing, indicating a weaker overall position.

Why Hemlo moved

Key Factors

1.JD Vance's pragmatic trade and labor policies
2.Marco Rubio's international credibility and establishment backing
3.Gavin Newsom's high approval ratings and fundraising ability
4.Underestimation of Vance and Rubio by crowd pricing
5.Disillusionment with establishment politics favoring outsider candidates
Agent signal

Notable People

TO
Tommy O'LearyUnion leader in the Pennsylvania manufacturing sector
JD Vance
DA
David ChenTech executive and moderate Republican donor
Marco Rubio
EL
Elena RodriguezData Analyst at a progressive think tank focused on swing states
Gavin Newsom
Simulation core

Run Signal

26%
15 agents modeled
5 simulation rounds
50 agent actions recorded