Hemlo vs Polymarket

US x Iran permanent peace deal by...?

Hemlo leader
December 3144% Hemlo
Outcome
Polymarket
Hemlo
May 15
22%
24%
May 31
38%
6%
June 30
54%
26%
December 31
73%
44%
Verdict

The simulation results indicate that the most likely outcome for a US-Iran permanent peace deal is December 31, with 44% of the votes. This outcome is driven by the belief that Iran will resist US pressures to maintain sovereignty, and that any significant dismantling of Iran's network will require substantial time for verification. The crowd pricing for December 31 is notably higher at 73%, suggesting that market participants are even more confident in this delayed outcome compared to the agents. The June 30 outcome, with 26% of the votes, reflects a strategic pause that benefits both sides, aligning with some agents' views on maintaining high tensions while appearing to pursue peace. The earlier dates, May 15 and May 31, received fewer votes, indicating skepticism about rapid resolutions due to internal power struggles in Iran and the complexity of negotiations.

Why Hemlo moved

Key Factors

1.Iran's resistance to perceived US pressures
2.Time required for verification of network dismantling
3.Strategic value of maintaining high tensions
4.Internal power struggles in Iran
5.Complexity of negotiation processes
Agent signal

Notable People

RE
Reza AhmadiPolicy advisor for a Tehran-based think tank
December 31
MI
Michael SterlingSenior lobbyist for a defense contractor firm
June 30
FA
Fatima Al-ZahraCommunity leader and organizer for Middle Eastern youth in the US
May 15
Simulation core

Run Signal

44%
15 agents modeled
5 simulation rounds
50 agent actions recorded